Dan McGraw of Fort Worth Weekly fame (I've never heard of him or the publication, but then I don't get out much) has a well-worded piece on why John Hart was not the total failure we make him out to be, and why the future of Jon Daniels may already be written in the stars.
I've heard this argument before, although not as well worded as McGraw's take. There's a lot of merit to this line of thinking. The Rangers make a ton of money, so why should Hicks change his thinking?
No comments:
Post a Comment